Clinical psychology, AI safety, research software

Accountable AI infrastructure for human stakes work.

Clinical duty of care, translated into systems that can be inspected, corrected, constrained, and held accountable.

I build local first memory, agent safety tooling, career decision safety, and research workflows for situations where correctness, consent, and auditability matter.

Operating Thesis

AI systems that touch human decisions need more than fluent output. They need evidence discipline, correction paths, consent boundaries, and audit trails.

Inspectable before intelligent

Memory and recommendations should be traceable before they become persuasive.

Automation with brakes

Drafting, deciding, and acting are different risk classes. Human authorization is a system boundary.

Evidence over performance theatre

Weak evidence should not become precise public claims just because the interface is confident.

Local first when stakes are human

Private reasoning surfaces need redaction, reversibility, and operator control by default.

Writing and Collaboration

Current writing focuses on accountable AI memory, career decision safety, agentic research workflows, and clinical duty of care as an engineering principle.

Open repositories